The Strategic Shift: Why Enterprises are moving to Jira Service ManagementThe Strategic Shift: Why Enterprises are moving to Jira Service Management

2

Oct

2025

Why Enterprises are Moving to Jira Service Management?

by GLiNTECH

For many organisations, legacy IT service management (ITSM) platforms remain deeply embedded within daily operations. These systems feel familiar, reliable, and in some cases feature-rich - making IT leaders hesitant to consider a transition. Concerns often center on two points: the perceived cost of migration and the possibility that Jira Service Management (JSM) may not yet fully replicate all legacy functionality.

These concerns are valid and worth careful consideration. However, organisations that continue to rely exclusively on legacy tools risk slowing down innovation, carrying unsustainable maintenance costs, and ultimately falling behind in service delivery. JSM provides a modern, agile, and cost-effective alternative - one that is designed to evolve with the needs of today’s enterprises.

1. Flexibility to Coexist - With a Clear Path to Transformation

Many enterprises begin their JSM journey by introducing it alongside their legacy system for selected functions such as DevOps-driven incident response, HR service delivery, or customer-facing portals. This hybrid model allows for controlled adoption and minimises risk.

Yet the long-term advantages of JSM become evident quickly. Where legacy systems are rigid and difficult to adapt, JSM offers flexibility in workflows, integrations, and deployment models. As business demands change, JSM enables teams to respond with agility - something legacy tools inherently struggle to support.

2. Understanding the True Cost of Legacy Platforms

Remaining on a legacy system may appear to be the lower-cost option in the short term. However, hidden expenses often outweigh the perceived savings:

  • High licensing and maintenance fees
  • Significant resource requirements for upgrades and patches
  • Dependence on external consultants for configuration or enhancements
  • Operational inefficiencies caused by inflexible architecture

By contrast, JSM’s cloud-first model significantly reduces total cost of ownership. Deployment is rapid, administrative overhead is minimal, and the Atlassian Marketplace offers thousands of extensions that eliminate the need for costly custom development. Over time, these factors deliver measurable financial and operational benefits.

3. Addressing the Feature Gap - While Unlocking New Potential

It is true that some legacy platforms still provide specialised capabilities that JSM may not replicate immediately. However, JSM evolves at a far faster pace, with regular updates, feature expansions, and an extensive ecosystem of third-party apps.

Moreover, JSM is not simply about matching the past - it is about enabling the future. With AI-driven automation, native DevOps integration, and collaboration across IT, development, and business teams, JSM positions organisations to achieve outcomes that legacy tools cannot.

4. Migration as a Strategic Investment - Not a Temporary Compromise

While some organisations initially consider running JSM alongside their legacy system, this approach only prolongs complexity and cost. Maintaining two platforms doubles administrative effort, increases licensing expenses, and fragments processes.

A full migration to JSM delivers far greater value. By consolidating service management into a single, modern platform, organisations eliminate redundant systems, simplify governance, and reduce costs. More importantly, they empower IT, development, and business teams to work seamlessly together - something legacy platforms cannot deliver at scale.

Migrating to JSM is not simply a tool change; it is a strategic investment that positions service management as a driver of innovation and efficiency across the enterprise.

Conclusion: Preparing for the Future of Service Management

Continuing with a legacy ITSM platform may feel safe, but it often comes at the cost of agility, innovation, and operational efficiency. While migration to JSM requires thoughtful planning and investment, the long-term advantages - lower costs, faster time to value, and future-ready capabilities - are substantial.

Jira Service Management is not simply a replacement for legacy systems; it is a strategic enabler for modern, collaborative, and resilient service delivery.

The real question is not whether JSM can match your legacy system today - it is whether your legacy system can support your organisation’s needs tomorrow.

Considering the switch? Let’s explore your options together.